Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1480MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 47W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 +64%
1.894 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P1000
130
Quadro K1200
131
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM107
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

47W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy