NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

VS

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 4 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1545MHz vs 1291MHz)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)

1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro P2000 Mobile

2.974 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +219%

9.492 TFLOPS

Blender

Quadro P2000 Mobile

284

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +697%

2265

OctaneBench

Quadro P2000 Mobile

56

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +332%

242

Quadro P2000 Mobile

VS

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Graphics Card

Feb 2019

Release Date

Jun 2020

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Quadro Mobile

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz

Base Clock

1035 MHz

1291 MHz

Boost Clock

1545 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

96.13GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

9

SM Count

48

-

Compute Units

-

1152

Shading Units

3072

72

TMUs

192

32

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

384

-

RT Cores

48

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

1280 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

98.88 GPixel/s

92.95 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

296.6 GTexel/s

46.48 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

18.98 TFLOPS

2.974 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

9.492 TFLOPS

92.95 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

296.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106

GPU Name

TU104B

-

GPU Variant

-

Pascal

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

16 nm

Process Size

12 nm

4.4 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

110W

-

Suggested PSU

-

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

6.1

CUDA

7.5

6.4

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q

2

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

3

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

4

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

5

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

6

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

7

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

8

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

9

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q

10

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

Related News

1

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

2

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

3

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

4

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

5

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

6

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

7

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

8

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

9

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

10

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports