Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1545MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +139%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
36
1152
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy