Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +523%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GF100
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
142W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy