Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +706%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GK208
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy