NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared a Professional market GPU: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1480MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+21%
3.031 TFLOPS
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
2973
T1000
+3%
3073
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
1350
T1000
+4%
1406
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
May 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Turing
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
TU117
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
