Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X +29%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2688
64
TMUs
224
40
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GK110
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy