NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+387%
3.031 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
512bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GT200B
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
