Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1480MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB +366%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1245 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
160bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
40
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GV100
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy