NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 189W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+400%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
189W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GT200B
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
