NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+853%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+1195%
272
Quadro K1000M
21
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK107
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
