NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+205%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+119%
272
Quadro M1000M
124
OctaneBench
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+115%
56
Quadro M1000M
26
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.89 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.78 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1017 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GM107
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
