Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2100MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +2336%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
1792
Shading Units
14592
112
TMUs
880
64
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
146 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy