NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1600MHz vs 1404MHz)

More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)

14592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro P3200 Max Q

5.032 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +941%

52.43 TFLOPS

Quadro P3200 Max Q

VS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Graphics Card

Feb 2018

Release Date

Jan 2023

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-B (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz

Base Clock

900 MHz

1404 MHz

Boost Clock

1600 MHz

1753 MHz

Memory Clock

1565 MHz

Memory

6GB

Memory Size

128GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM2e

192bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

168.3GB/s

Bandwidth

3205GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

1792

Shading Units

16384

112

TMUs

1024

64

ROPs

0

-

Tensor Cores

1024

-

RT Cores

128

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per EU)

1536 KB

L2 Cache

408 MB

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

157.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1638 GTexel/s

78.62 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

52.43 TFLOPS

5.032 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.43 TFLOPS

157.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104

GPU Name

Ponte Vecchio

-

GPU Variant

-

Pascal

Architecture

Generation 12.5

TSMC

Foundry

Intel

16 nm

Process Size

10 nm

7.2 billion

Transistors

100 billion

314 mm²

Die Size

1280 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

2400W

-

Suggested PSU

2800 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

6.1

CUDA

-

6.4

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q

2

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

3

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

4

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

5

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6

6

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

7

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

8

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

9

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

10

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD