Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q +1238%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy