CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+709%
5.032 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
VS
Tesla S1075
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
2
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
3
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
4
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
6
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
7
NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
8
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
9
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
10
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy