Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1543MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +151%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
108
1792
Shading Units
6912
112
TMUs
432
64
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy