Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1543MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +23%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
3072
112
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM200
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy