Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1543MHz vs 1038MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +30%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
861 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy