NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1543MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25
+122%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1328 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
