Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +1052%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy