Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1252MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +2066%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1228 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
108
256
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GA100
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy