NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
+96%
0.641 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1228 MHz
Base Clock
-
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK107
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
