Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P500 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P500 Mobile
0.777 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +32%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
256
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
24.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
12.14 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
777.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
24.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy