Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1582MHz vs 1530MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile
6.48 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +141%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1278 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GV100
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy