Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +38478%
8.873 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
1
2560
Shading Units
8
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

180W
TDP
12W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G98
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy