NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1569MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+600%
8.033 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P520 Mobile
19
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+563%
126
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1303 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
18W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
