Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q +995%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy