Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q +641%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy