NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1569MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+600%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+563%
126
Quadro P520 Mobile
19
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
3
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
18W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GP108
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
