NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1785MHz vs 1569MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+119%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
