Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2100MHz vs 1747MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8.945 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +1726%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
19456
160
TMUs
880
64
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
146 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy