NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

VS

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages

Lower TDP (100W vs 750W)

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2100MHz vs 1747MHz)

More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)

16896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro P5200 Mobile

8.945 TFLOPS

AMD Instinct MI300X +1726%

163.4 TFLOPS

Quadro P5200 Mobile

VS

AMD Instinct MI300X

Graphics Card

Feb 2018

Release Date

Dec 2023

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Instinct

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-B (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz

Base Clock

1000 MHz

1747 MHz

Boost Clock

2100 MHz

1804 MHz

Memory Clock

5200 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

192GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM3

256bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

230.9GB/s

Bandwidth

5300GB/s

Render Config

20

SM Count

-

Compute Units

304

2560

Shading Units

19456

160

TMUs

880

64

ROPs

0

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

2 MB

L2 Cache

16 MB

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

279.5 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1496 GTexel/s

139.8 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

1300 TFLOPS

8.945 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

163.4 TFLOPS

279.5 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104

GPU Name

MI300

-

GPU Variant

-

Pascal

Architecture

CDNA 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

16 nm

Process Size

5 nm

7.2 billion

Transistors

146 billion

314 mm²

Die Size

1017 mm²

Board Design

100W

TDP

750W

-

Suggested PSU

1000 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

6.1

CUDA

-

6.4

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile

2

NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

3

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

4

NVIDIA Quadro K500M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

5

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

6

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

7

NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

8

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

9

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

10

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance