NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+290%
8.945 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1536
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
