Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 89% (1747MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +372%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy