Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1747MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +1229%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
837 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy