Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1747MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +169%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy