NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+770%
8.945 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
448
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
