NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1133%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
8192
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
