Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 +92%
1.196 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
188W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy