Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +2633%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
24
3840
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GT200B
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy