Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +21306%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
G84
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
42W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy