Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1785MHz vs 1645MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +245%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
16
3840
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
TU117
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy