CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P6000
NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+258%
12.63 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P6000
+229%
181
Tesla K20c
55
Quadro P6000
VS
Tesla K20c
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
2496
240
TMUs
208
96
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GK110
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
3
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
4
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
5
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
6
NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
7
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
8
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
9
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
10
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy