Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1645MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 432.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +19%
12.63 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
3584
240
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GP100
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy