Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1443MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 Mobile
1.478 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +897%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1177 MHz
Base Clock
-
1443 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
46.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
23.09 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
46.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy