NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1545MHz vs 1443MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 Mobile
1.478 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+542%
9.492 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P620 Mobile
1380
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+562%
9149
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1177 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1443 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
48
512
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
46.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
23.09 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
46.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
