NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
We compared a Professional market GPU: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1354MHz vs 1100MHz)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
+1%
1.408 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P620
+5%
1294
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
1230
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P620
356
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
+76%
628
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2020
Quadro
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Professional
Type
Integrated
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.00 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.00 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.816 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1408 GFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
352.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
132 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
