Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1380MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +919%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
80
512
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy