Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 +20%
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P620 +38%
130
Quadro K4000M
94
OctaneBench
Quadro P620 +25%
25
Quadro K4000M
20
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy