Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro Plex 2200 D2 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 640W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro Plex 2200 D2
0.622 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +2121%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Plex
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
7680
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

640W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy